Ideology of the DEAF

2008 November 3

web stats

I just got done watching “re-defining D-E-A-F” which is located on this “MOS International” website.  There’s a lot of references to how deaf people were defined from centuries ago and how the definition had changed.  There were scenes where it appears to show an image that shows the world, that deaf people are not boring, dull, or dumb. But, that they are exciting, smart, and they can copulate too, except they can’t hear.  Surely the world knows deaf people do have sex, after all, there have been scenes in movies where deaf people have been making out. Don’t forget, there’s even deaf porn, too! And, don’t forget the “L word” as well.

Anyways, I guess that is what this blogger was referring to, selling via sex, sexy, attractiveness, etc. But, it is not the meat of the production.

I think the message of “Re-Defining D-E-A-F” is probably a good film for those deaf people who are video bloggers over at DVTV.

First off, IDEOLOGY is a perception on the world based on assumptions which is/are learned. Or, a set of ideas proposed by the dominant class of a society to all members of this society

Perception created through ideology changes representation.

Representation, Actually refers to how we represent ourselves as deaf people. How we or the media, for example, influence the perception that the world has about deaf people. For example, look at all the films done on deaf individuals. Or, look at the historical references to deaf people by philosophers and doctors. Over centuries, we know how deaf people were labeled. The words used was not positive. Such as, we’re boring, dull, dumb, etc and the need to change perception to sexy, smart, etc.

Basically, Ryan stressed that one way to represent ourselves as we move on with technology is to take advantage of the media. Especially with Internet as it is. Media via Internet is cheap.

Many references were used throughout the film. One such reference was Stuart Hall. A book was written by him ” Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices.” He also wrote many other books relating to culture and representation. He has a theory that visual image changes American culture and the power of media as a medium.

So, we are deaf. We have access to media. We might not like how the media has represent the deaf community. The best way to change perception on deaf people is to change the Ideology.

Now, here comes the meaty part.

First off, we know sex sells. We know dressing up sexy sells. We know guys are more likely to buy a product if a sexy girl is standing next to a COOL car. We know girls are more likely to buy a product when some guy on the commercial starts kissing the girl’s neck because he likes the smell of a perfume.

But, I believe Ryan was talking about cheap Internet media. How we make videos online and to share it with the world. It wasn’t clear if he meant we all should be making films online or if it was more of our own personal videos that we make for DVTV.

Nevertheless, Let’s look at DVTV. As a culturally deaf HOH person, my first impressions when I saw several videos on DVTV was not exactly good. But, then I reasoned with myself that it is just like You Tube where there are many videos made by many people and not all of them are cool. For example, there was this guy that was crying and screaming “Leave Brit alone!” and then there’s this stupid “3 girls and a cup” or was it “two guys and a cup” or was it “3 guys and a truck?” Either way, I have not seen that video, but since people were saying it made them vomit, who the heck wants to watch something like that?

And then, one wonders about who would succeed in defining deaf people, as a commenter stated in this blogger’s post that, “The upcoming and future generations of deaf children will define the deaf community for themselves, not according to older traditions or culture unfortunately.” Who would eventually better represent deaf people, if anything at all?

The mainstream community does not need to change their ideology, they do not need to be represented other than what they always have, especially if they are a white person.

So, DVTV video bloggers, you all have a BIG job to do, that is, if I understood Ryan’s intentions. Whatever you do on DVTV with your video, you are telling the world “This is how deaf people are.” So, if you guys are behaving like kids and if the perception you are showing the world makes people think less of you, you are the cause of what the world thinks of you. You need to feed into the needs of the world’s fetishness in order to create an ideology that you are no different from them in order to show that deaf people are/should be represented no less than the world. Or something like that…..

Before you start making a video to put online, especially DVTV and perhaps Deafread, ask yourself this: How will I represent the deaf culture with this finished product?

Not everyone feels the need to change ideology in order to create the perception that the world has of a person or a group of people.  As for me, I feel that the perception the world has of me is good because I am a person first and foremost before I am anything else.  I take care of me since my people can’t do a good job of representing me.

Video subtitled song by NAS “I Know I can” created by ErlendSkavelem over at You Tube.

17 Responses
  1. 2008 November 3

    Thank you!

    “You must be the change you wish to see in the world.”

    Gandhi.

    mwahs!

    Ben

  2. 2008 November 3
    White Ghost permalink

    I have not seen the film you just saw. The way you are describing got me thinking…..

    I realized that we are in the customs in America. If we live in Australia, we would live with the different customs.

    For example, Jodi, An American Mom in Tuscany: Jordan’s Cochlear Implant story, she lives in Italy and does not have the Halloween traditions there. She has to live with the customs in Italy.

    So, IMHO, the film, Re-defining D-E-A-F shows that we are in the “normal” life like everybody have in America generally.

  3. 2008 November 3
    Karen Mayes permalink

    Hmmm… I did watch part of the film (it froze, so I could not finish viewing the rest of the film…)

    White Ghoast has a good point… cultural differences, highlighted by media and politics. Plus I want to throw in one more thing… deaf people tend to be more visual, so I *guess* we see sex a little differently from hearing people in America? I could be wrong though…

  4. 2008 November 3
    Karen Mayes permalink

    Okay, I just finished viewing the film.

    Hmmm… I first learned of the word “ideology” in political science classes at Westminster College, a little more than 2 decades ago. So I had to loosen up my fixture of the 1980ish definition of the ideology, to try to understand what Ryan was talking about. I have to say that I had trouble understanding how sex played the role in his film and I have only a few ideas why he included the one-night stand or the beginning of the relationship, however we want to perceive, in his film. So far I see media, medicine, societal expectations, and the basic human needs cited as the reason for why the deaf population is largely labeled with the term “deafness”. I can see why Ryan challenges us if we wanted to redefine D-E-A-F, and I do see how the concept of deafhood plays its role in redefining it.

    Candy, I think I understand what you are saying about DVTV… to me, I see DVTV as a visual meeting place for deaf people (a kind of a cyberspace deaf club for deaf people to exchange jokes, experiences, heated outbursts, etc.) and there are a FEW vloggers who’d go out of way to discuss cultural aspects of our community. I like what Ryan said about diversity… that it opens up many new opportunities (opportunities for more music, more acceptance of degrees of hearing loss, more tolerance of oracy (?), etc.) Of course, each of us has our own definition of what deaf means to each of us and of course, according to the need to change ideology, there are groups of deaf people who’d insist on defining what deaf culture should contain, etc.

    Sex in the film… I might be an old fashioned person, because it does not really click for me (ASL sells sex?) I do remember in 1980’s, that to hearing people, sex with deaf people should be more exciting because it was all hands. Okay, let’s not go to there ;o)

    I will need to watch the film again to gain a stronger understanding of it.

  5. 2008 November 3
    Ann_C permalink

    Looks like I’m gonna hafta wait for the subtitles to come out in February for Ryan’s film. It’s too bad that it didn’t come with subtitles first off, the film would have a much wider audience. But then such response would have blown the bandwidth in a matter of minutes, heh. :)

    Indeed the internet has the fastest growing market of users, and because it is visual, it is a great advantage for deaf people to finally communicate with all kinds of people. There are subtitling programs for videos (there I go again) that makes it possible for an ASL-user and a hearing speaker to communicate, for example. There are translation programs for an English-speaking person to communicate with someone who speaks Chinese, for another example.

    Film/ video is a medium that deaf people can utilize to open up their world to others and vice-versa, to welcome others to learn about the deaf community and change “public” perceptions about deafness, ASL and deaf culture. And an awareness of what has gone on for 128 years in deaf history.

    The deaf community is a very small one, a lot like living in a small town in which everybody knows everybody too well. It has its advantages and disadvantages. But this “small town” is getting bigger through internet communications, whether Deaf culture members like it or not. Can’t stay in that comfort zone forever.

    What people forget when they’re online is that the internet is indeed a VERY public forum. What gets aired out online is what everybody sees or reads and the stuff is pretty much on record. That goes not only for other deaf people but also for hearing parents of deaf children, hearing family members and friends, the hearing world, employers, and, of course, the hearing members of the media. If one wants to REALLY let his hair down and rip about some hearies or about somebody you’re mad at, I’d suggest doing that via email or VP amongst your friends. Leave the personal stuff at home and off the internet open forums.

    That’s not to say that discussing deaf issues shouldn’t take place, they should be discussed openly to let other people and the media know what we’re discussing and realize we’re not that “dumb”, that we can hold intelligent and reasonable sign-versations on DVTV or write/sign about issues in depth in DR, for examples.

    True, that sex sells in this country. Not sure I’d want to view sign language or Deaf culture as “sexy” though, could get misinterpreted. Perhaps better to associate a degree of “coolness” with society, the way trendsetters do. Like it’s cool now to be a vegetarian or an environmentalist. Or is being sexy “cool”??? That’s so Hollywood, ya know.

  6. 2008 November 3
    Karen Mayes permalink

    Sex appears to be the dominating force of the American culture which includes diversity. I was taken back when Ryan introduced “fetishism” and when he explained it, it makes a lot of sense to me.

    Yup… so Hollywood. No wonder other countries view us American as sex-crazed people obsessed with clothes, toys, makeups, media, etc…we do have a lot of fetishes all right. So ASL is a fetish?

  7. 2008 November 3
    Joseph Pietro Riolo permalink

    Perhaps, the video is sending us a subliminal message trying to tell us that ASL really stands for “American Sexual Language” or “American Sexualizing Language”. :-)

    I hope the readers have some sense of humor.

    I have some mixed feelings about the video. I agree with many points made by Candy and the commenters. For me, the video does remind me very strongly of propaganda that appeals to emotions of the population, very similar to the theme of the video. But, still the video is a good one.

    Joseph Pietro Riolo
    josephpietrojeungriolo@gmail.com

    Public domain notice: I put all of my expressions in this post in the public domain.

  8. 2008 November 3
    Karen Mayes permalink

    *chuckling at Joseph’s attempt at humor*… American Sexual Language… one should write a book called “The Joy of American Sexual Language”, huh?

    ;o)

  9. 2008 November 3
    White Ghost permalink

    QQh, will Paddy Ladd accept the Joy of American Sexual Language?

    we’ll see……he has to say about this……but…..we are not the british. He will not tell us what to do….. ;-)

  10. 2008 November 3
    Joseph Pietro Riolo permalink

    LOL on Karen’s comment. I could not go that far! :-) But, she raised a good point. When a video is interspersed with the sexual activity, it is too easy for the viewers to sexualize the whole video. That’s one downside I see but it is just my POV (point of view).

    (I was curious and googled on “The Joy of American Sign Language”. I got few results. There is an essay on the subject but it is not free.)

    Joseph Pietro Riolo
    josephpietrojeungriolo@gmail.com

    Public domain notice: I put all of my expressions in this post in the public domain.

  11. 2008 November 3
    White Ghost permalink

    That’s interesting, Joseph.

    I think that’s very competitive essay. Too many students have written the essay over the years and it’s pretty strong common….make sense to me.

  12. 2008 November 3
    Ann_C permalink

    LOL, Joseph, the “The Joy of Sex” and “The Joy of ASL”.

    I can just see where some people will take off with this analogy. “The Dictionary of Dirty Sex Signs” next…

  13. 2008 November 3

    LOL

    Sorry, I wasn’t able to respond today, had other pressing matters…

    So, I appreciate the sexual humor here. ;)

    Anyway, thank you all for commenting. Great feedbacks!

  14. 2008 November 3

    Guys and Gals ..

    I’ve a question: how do you explain an entendre?

    ;)

    Paotie

  15. 2008 November 3
    Ann_C permalink

    Isn’t “entendre” a French word for “meaning”? How about double-entendre?

  16. 2008 November 3

    Ann ..

    Or even multiple-entendres?

  17. 2008 November 3

    Life is full of multiple interpretations….

Comments are closed for this entry.